Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

In re Guaranty Insurance Services, Inc.

The Texas Supreme Court has held that when a paralegal works on a case at one firm, and then moves to another firm on the opposing side of that litigation, two presumptions come into play. The second presumption, that the paralegal shared confidential information about the case with members of the new firm, may be rebutted by a showing "that sufficient precautions have been taken to guard against any disclosure of confidences." Because the firm's screening procedure was ineffective to prevent the paralegal at issue here from actually working on both sides of the same litigation, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion to disqualify. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Austin Court of Appeals, No. 03-09-00640-CV, 04-16-2010

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
OPINION

Relator Guaranty Insurance Services (“Guaranty Insurance”) has filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to vacate the trial court’s order disqualifying its counsel. On October 12, 2009, the trial court granted a motion to disqualify Guaranty Insurance’s counsel, Strasburger & Price (“Strasburger”), on the ground that a paralegal who had performed work on behalf of Guaranty Insurance while working for Strasburger had also performed work on behalf of the opposing party, Trans-Global Solutions, Inc. (“Trans-Global”), during his previous employment at the law firm of Godwin Pappas Langley Ronquillo, LLP (“Godwin”).

The Texas Supreme Court has held that when a paralegal works on a case at one firm, and then moves to another firm on the opposing side of that litigation, two presumptions come into play. See Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. Marshall, 887 S.W.2d 831, 834-35 (Tex. 1994). First, there is a conclusive presumption that the paralegal acquired confidential information during his work on the case at the first firm. Id. at 834. Second, there is a rebuttable presumption that the paralegal shared confidential information about the case with the members of the new firm. Id. at 835. This second presumption may be rebutted by a showing “that sufficient precautions have been taken to guard against any disclosure of confidences.” Id.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
British Legal Awards 2024
November 27, 2024
London

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.


Learn More
GlobeSt. Healthcare Real Estate 2024
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
ThinkAdvisor LUMINARIES Awards 2024
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Attorney - Insurance Defense

Downtown property and casualty defense law firm seeks litigation associate with 2+ years' experience in insurance defense litigation. The fi...


Apply Now ›
Labor & Employment Counsel - New York, NY

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Counsel in our renowned Labor & Employment Department, working w...


Apply Now ›
(NEW) ASSISTANT GENERAL COUNSEL WANTED FOR PRIVATELY HELD HEALTHCARE COMPANY (Oak Brook, IL)

Our client, a large, privately-owned healthcare company, has engaged us to find an Assistant General Counsel for their headquarters located ...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs