Lawyers expect a recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to stanch the outpouring of whistleblower lawsuits accusing companies of falsely labeling their products as covered by patents. The suits sprang from a December 2009 Federal Circuit ruling calling for up to $500 in fines for each offending product sold, not up to $500 in total.

By late April, plaintiffs lawyers had filed more than 175 false marking lawsuits in district courts around the country in response to the earlier Federal Circuit ruling. Defense lawyers call the cases “nuisance suits” and the filers “bounty hunters.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]