X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
SUBMITTED AUGUST 28, 2012

Before POSNER, ROVNER, and WOOD, Circuit Judges.

In 2004 the defendant pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute crack cocaine. Because of the amount of crack involved, his base offense level was 36. U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(2) (2004). The judge reduced the level to 33 because the defendant had accepted re- sponsibility for his crime. His guidelines sentencing range, based on that offense level and a Category VI criminal history, was 235 to 293 months, and the judge sentenced him to the bottom figure. Because the defendant was a career offender, the judge was required, in the first instance, to calculate the guide- lines sentence from the career-offender guideline table, U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1(b). But the defendant’s base offense level in the table was only 34, and it decreased to 31 because of his accepting responsibility for his criminal conduct–and in calculating the guidelines range for a career offender the judge is required to use the higher of the offense level in the career-offender table or the offense level in the guideline that would be applicable were the defendant not a career offender. United States v. Washington, 618 F.3d 869, 870-71 and n. 7 (8th Cir. 2010), and cases cited there. In this case the higher level was the one in the latter guideline–33 (after the 3-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility), versus only 31 in the career-offender guideline.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More
March 24, 2025 - March 27, 2025
New York, NY

Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.


Learn More

Search for the President and Dean California Western School of Law San Diego, California California Western School of Law (California ...


Apply Now ›

Duane Morris LLP has an opening for an associate with 2-3 years of experience with strong capital markets and corporate transactional backgr...


Apply Now ›

Our client, an established provider of professional liability insurance, has engaged us to identify a highly-qualified Senior Bad Faith Tria...


Apply Now ›