A race discrimination suit against Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan brought by a former contract attorney has been dismissed. Kisshia Simmons-Grant, in a 2011 complaint in Simmons-Grant v. Quinn Emanuel, 1:11-cv-07706, said that as a black contract attorney she was assigned less lucrative work than non-black contract attorneys at Quinn. She claims the firm discriminated against her because of her race and then gave her no choice but to quit in 2010 after she complained. To support her claims, she offered statistical evidence to show full-time black contract lawyers billed fewer hours compared with all other full-time contract attorneys at Quinn during a certain period.

But Southern District Judge Laura Taylor Swain (See Profile), in granting Quinn’s summary judgment motion, said individual private plaintiffs must prove they were individually the victims of intentional bias. Extending the “pattern or practice” method of proof to the non-class context would allow non-class private plaintiffs “to shift the burden to employers to prove that they did not discriminate against a particular individual,” she wrote, citing a Second Circuit decision in Chin v. Port Authority, 685 F.3d 135 (2012).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com