In the most recent installment of an ongoing venue dispute between Penn State and its insurance company, Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance Co. has accused the university of frivolous litigation, delay tactics and disregarding court orders in Penn State’s attempt to have the underlying coverage dispute litigated on its home turf.
The case of Pennsylvania Manufacturers’ Association Insurance v. Pennsylvania State University stems from the first claim made by an accuser of convicted serial child molester and former Penn State assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, and is over the extent to which PMA, one of the university’s general liability carriers for decades, is liable to cover Penn State’s court costs and damages related to that claim.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
