ALBANY – The Court of Appeals on Tuesday overturned a murder conviction where the defendant endured a 49-1/2-hour interrogation, unanimously deciding that an eight-hour break between the lengthy grilling and a subsequent confession failed to restore the defendant to the point where he could make a reasoned decision.

In a unanimous opinion, the court reversed the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which said the gap in questioning, along with the fact that the defendant was represented by assigned counsel by the time he confessed, eliminated the taint of the clearly improper, marathon interrogation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]