Proper technology, process, and training could have saved Baker & McKenzie clients $150 million last year. That is my utterly unfair and possibly inaccurate alternative headline to the fantastic Law Technolgy News' article from Stuart Kay, Baker's director of global systems, about his firmwide rollout of Office 2010.
The article caught my attention because questioning and testing the basic technological competence of outside counsel is among my hobbyhorses. In particular, I contend that our shortcomings are more a product of poor process and lack of training than a deficient technology — i.e., we have a people problem, not an IT problem. Thus, the sweet comfort of confirmation bias enveloped me when Kay wrote, "We estimated that by adopting the templates and training our personnel to use them we would see a 6.5 percent productivity improvement — over a bare rollout of Office 2010." Multiplying that 6.5 percent by $2.3 billion, Baker & McKenzie's 2012 revenue according to The American Lawyer's 2013 edition of the Am Law 100 chart, got me to the $150 million. (Baker ranked #2 overall this year, ceding the top spot of the leader board to DLA Piper, which squeaked ahead of them with $240.5 million.)
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
