The novel approach taken in one of the challenges to Pennsylvania’s ban on same-sex marriage has drawn some skepticism from the bench.
The case filed last September—one of several filed in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Windsor a year ago—challenging the portion of Pennsylvania’s marriage law that declares same-sex unions formed in other states to be void in the state had two hours of arguments Thursday morning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
