Calling out the National Labor Relations Board as moving toward “serving as the litigation arm of the union” rather than enforcing federal labor law, a federal judge granted the NLRB’s broad subpoenas of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, but stayed their implementation so that UPMC can seek appellate review.
U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab of the Western District of Pennsylvania, faced with the NLRB’s request to enforce three subpoenas that it had served on UPMC, expressed his misgivings about the scope of what the NLRB sought in the subpoenas, but acknowledged his court’s narrow discretion to weigh them.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
