Corn refiners in a legal battle against the sugar industry have moved to disqualify opposing counsel, claiming the June 1 merger creating Squire Patton Boggs has created a conflict in the case.

Squire Sanders brought the trademark lawsuit in 2011 on behalf of The Sugar Association Inc. in Washington and nine of its members, alleging that the Corn Refiners Association and its members misled consumers through a $130 million advertising campaign declaring that corn syrup is “natural,” that “sugar is sugar,” that “your body can’t tell the difference” and that it’s “nutritionally the same as table sugar.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]