From the personal to the legal to the religious, opponents of same-sex marriage offer the U.S. Supreme Court a potpourri of arguments in support of their belief that the court should uphold state bans.
A property owner claims same-sex marriage would erode his property and personal values. A Connecticut lawyer says it would legalize a man marrying his brother or father, even “a man’s marrying a female blood relative—if she is too old to get pregnant.” A group that supports former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee urges the high court to follow his lead and not be the “Supreme Being” that “judicial supremacy” has created.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
