The U.S. Department of Justice has filed its opposition to U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez’s motion to move his corruption trial from New Jersey to Washington, D.C., calling his analysis faulty and “results-oriented.”

Menendez’s analysis of factors supporting his motion to change trial venue “mischaracterizes key facts” and double-counts some Washington witnesses while omitting some others based in New Jersey, prosecutors said in opposition to the senator’s transfer motion. Furthermore, Menendez’s motion wrongly describes his attorneys as based in Washington—Abbe Lowell of Chadbourne & Parke has acknowledged to the judge that he splits his time between New York and Washington, and the only other lawyer to appear for the senator, Jenny Kramer, is based in New York, prosecutors said in court papers.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]