It was a victory-from-the-jaws-of-defeat moment for lawyers from Davis Polk & Wardwell and Winston & Strawn when a federal judge in Delaware on Friday voided a $27.6 million jury verdict against their client Comcast IP Holdings. The case raises the question: Why try patent suits before juries in the first place?
August 09, 2015 at 09:28 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Litigation Daily
It was a victory-from-the-jaws-of-defeat moment for lawyers from Davis Polk & Wardwell and Winston & Strawn when a federal judge in Delaware on Friday voided a $27.6 million jury verdict against their client Comcast IP Holdings.
The cable giant subsidiary was sued by Sprint Communications Co. for patent infringement. After a four-day trial in February, a jury sided with Sprint all the way.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Florida International University College of Law, South Florida s public law school, invites applicants for a contract position in Legal Skil...
LEGAL PRACTICE ASSISTANT- NEW JERSEY OFFICE: Prominent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a Legal Practice...
Maggs, McDermott & DiCicco is seeking an associate with approximately 5 years of worker s compensation experience who is committed to ex...
