Hearing oral argument in a case that could determine whether a person could break the law by aiding someone in a failed suicide, First District Court of Appeal Justices Carol Corrigan and Joanne Parrilli lightened things up by using each other as examples in their hypothetical scenarios.
Parrilli got the ball rolling by asking a glad-to-cooperate San Jose lawyer why she wouldn’t be culpable for providing pills to help Corrigan, her friend of 27 years, attempt suicide.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
