ruling that zealous advocacy on behalf of a client does not excuse an attorney's belligerence during discovery, the 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed on Aug. 8 the imposition of sanctions against a defense attorney on the ground that the plaintiff's counsel had made no attempt to confer in good faith prior to his motion to compel discovery. Naviant Marketing Solutions Inc. v. Larry Tucker Inc., No. 02-3201.
August 18, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...