In enacting N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1, the Legislature made a policy decision that those involved in the design, planning, construction, or supervision of an improvement of real property were entitled to the security afforded by a bright-line statute of repose, and the trial court therefore correctly determined that an architect who is named as a defendant beyond the 10-year period permitted in N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 is not subject to suit under the principles of fictitious-party practice and relation back; here, w
March 22, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New Jersey Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...