Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Because plaintiff did not rely on circumstantial evidence to substantiate his claims of asbestos-related injuries, there was no requirement that he also establish the regularity and frequency of his exposure; and the trial court erred in granting defendant summary judgment due to his failure to produce such evidence. Reversed and remanded.
March 22, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Legal Intelligencer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Our client, a boutique litigation firm established by former BigLaw partners, is seeking to hire a commercial litigation associate to join e...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C.Prominent mid Atlantic law firm with multiple regional office locations seeks a senior attorney with commercial real estate ...
ATTORNEYS WANTED ROCKLAND/BERGEN COUNTYKantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. Expanding and established multi-practice, mul...