The court finds no basis for a conclusion that the radiologist's training or experience qualify him to offer an expert opinion on the standard of care for the performance of embolization of brain tumors, and the report and curriculum vitae cannot reasonably be read to demonstrate that the radiologist is so qualified.
June 14, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Women Leaders in Consulting Awards honors the industry standouts and rising stars who are making a mark within the profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York, NY office for a Litigation Associate with 2 to 4 years of experience. The ideal ...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
Boutique union side labor law firm seeks an entry level attorney that can thrive in a fast paced practice that is growing at a rapid rate. E...
