The district court did not err in concluding that the memorandum of understanding contemplated that Fluorine on Call Ltd. would expend a substantial sum of money in fulfilling its obligations and that, thus, a reasonable term should be implied.
August 23, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...
