When Paul Gilbertson's surveying license was revoked, he appealed the revocation to the Oregon Court of Appeals and simultaneously filed a suit in federal court seeking money damages from the members of the board for violations of his constitutional rights. Gilbertson's case gave the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals the opportunity to clarify what it admitted were its "mixed signals" about when and how federal courts should abstain from hearing a case when there is a parallel state proceeding.
September 13, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...