E-mail evidence is one of the newest and sharpest arrows in the government’s quiver. In recent years the government has won several convictions based on little more than damning e-mail evidence. Nonetheless, people continue to use e-mail casually or even thoughtlessly, producing a data stream of potential admissions. To make matters worse, with the proliferation of portable e-mail devices, such as the ubiquitous BlackBerry, the attention paid to each e-mail diminishes while the amount sent rises dramatically. The BlackBerry is so addictive it’s been dubbed the “CrackBerry.” More than ever, people are using portable e-mail devices owned by their employer to send slapdash messages about sensitive matters without a second thought for whether the e-mail truly is confidential.
This recklessness extends even to e-mail communications between attorneys and clients — a troubling development because, while clients write things to their attorneys that they never would want a judge or jury to read, such communications, if sent over company e-mail systems, may not be privileged. Attorney-client e-mail may wind up in the jury room, much to the chagrin of its author and contrary to an attorney’s obligation to ensure that client communications are handled in a confidential manner.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
