It’s June 30, 2006. The CEO bursts into your office. He’s fuming over a notice of deposition he just received in an action filed against the company by Jane Rainmaker, a former employee.
Apparently, Jane was a top sales employee who terminated employment in early 2005. Without consulting you, a regional office brought her back as an independent sales agent on a full-time schedule. Jane now alleges that, due to the company’s negligence, she may owe over 20 percent additional taxes on the distribution she took from the company’s deferred compensation plan upon terminating employment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
