A recent decision by a 9th U.S. Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel rejected the prevailing standard for authenticating electronically stored records and imposed stringent requirements that may help defend against computerized evidence in a broad range of cases, including white-collar prosecutions. In re: Vinhnee, 2005 WL 3609376 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Dec. 16, 2005). Although decisions of the panel, which consists of three bankruptcy judges, are binding precedent only for bankruptcy courts in the 9th Circuit, Vinhnee‘s persuasive analysis has the potential to change the use of electronic evidence in other courts.
Most federal courts admit computer records under Fed. R. Evid. 803(6) on a showing that they are business records kept pursuant to a routine procedure for reasons that tend to assure their accuracy. See, e.g., United States v. Salgado, 250 F.3d 438, 452 (6th Cir. 2001); United States v. Destnik, 36 F.3d 904, 909-10 (10th Cir. 1994). Vinhnee does not conflict with that approach to the hearsay issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
