A Nassau County, N.Y., judge has held that a disgruntled owner of a Queens Village drugstore presented evidence that he was deceived about the financial health of the pharmacy when he invested in the company.

New York Supreme Court Justice Ute Wolff Lally held in Barrett v. Freifeld, 001891/2006, that plaintiff Andrew Barrett’s claims for fraud and breach of contract in connection with his purchase of 222 Jamaica Economy Drug could proceed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]