A man wanting parental rights to children conceived with his donated sperm is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court. Daryl Hendrix's attorneys seek to overturn a ruling by the Kansas Supreme Court, which found that a state law that doesn't give donors parental rights unless there's a written agreement is indeed constitutional. The court said the decision upholding the 1994 law was a first in the U.S. because no other state has ruled on a provision requiring a written agreement between mother and donor.
March 21, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
A Topeka, Kan., man wanting parental rights to children conceived with sperm he donated is taking his case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Attorneys for Daryl Hendrix on Monday filed an appeal with the Court, seeking to overturn a Kansas Supreme Court ruling last year.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Women Leaders in Consulting Awards honors the industry standouts and rising stars who are making a mark within the profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
General Statement of DutiesPerforms legal work involving full litigation of all types of matters both for and against the Town, including al...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking a attorney to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have a mi...
Health Law Associate CT Shipman is seeking an associate to join our national longstanding health law practice. Candidates must have t...
