Knocking down a novel award to automobile insurers, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that only the direct victims of crimes are entitled to court-ordered restitution.

In a quirky interpretation of a section of Proposition 8, the so-called “Victims Bill of Rights” passed in 1994, the unanimous court held that trial courts could not split restitution between defendants as a condition of probation and insurers who have already reimbursed victims.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]