When he emerged from the appellate court arguments on the suppression of his client’s statements in connection with a bank robbery, James W. Hundley felt his stomach churn.
A seemingly unremarkable criminal case, to which a court appointed him shortly after he launched his private practice a little more than three years ago, had taken a turn down a road that ultimately would lead it to the U.S. Supreme Court.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
