It began as a run-of-the-mill age discrimination case, a test of wills between a fired supervisor named Roger Reeves, and a company in Columbus, Miss., that manufactures more than 20,000 toilet seats a day.

Reeves won before a jury, but a federal appeals court overturned its verdict, propelling the case to the U.S. Supreme Court for an examination of fundamental Seventh Amendment issues that could affect all civil litigation, as well as statutory issues that could influence all employment discrimination cases based on federal law. Yes, the Seventh Amendment, the right to jury trials in civil cases that almost never gets a workout before the Supreme Court — even though it is the wellspring of civil litigation.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]