When the district court ruled, and when the panel initially considered this appeal, Va. Code Ann. �2.1-804 defined “sexually explicit content” to include:
(i) any description of or (ii) any picture, photograph, drawing, motion picture film, digital image or similar visual representation depicting sexual bestiality, a lewd exhibition of nudity, as nudity is defined in �18.2-390, sexual excitement, sexual conduct or sadomasochistic abuse, as also defined in �18.2-390, coprophilia, urophilia, or fetishism.
Following the court’s panel decision, the Virginia General Assembly amended the definition of “sexually explicit content” to add the the word “lascivious,” so that it now reads:
content having as a dominant theme (i) any lascivious description of or (ii) any lascivious picture, photograph, drawing, motion picture film, digital image or similar visual representation. �
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
