Denying insurance coverage for infertility treatments that can only be performed on women is not unlawful discrimination, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled. Finding that the "exclusion of surgical impregnation procedures disadvantages infertile male and female employees equally," the court said an employer who refused to pay for artificial insemination did not violate the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
January 17, 2003 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...