Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn’t sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court.
Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm’s former lawyers.
Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn't sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court. Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm's former lawyers. The idea got a cool reception Wednesday during oral arguments in a case that saw nine major law firms and two large county bar associations filing briefs as amici curiae to oppose the concept. California appellate courts are split on the issue.
September 06, 2007 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Giving a client years more to sue a law firm for malpractice apparently didn’t sound like such a swell idea to the California Supreme Court.
Not even if that client continues to be represented by one of the firm’s former lawyers.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Columbia Law School seeks an experienced lawyer with a background in criminal defense and a strong interest in community lawyering and clini...
WittKieffer is proud to partner with Mom's Meals in the search for their Director of Legal Affairs. Mom's Meals is an investor-owned compan...
Nutley Law firm concentrating in plaintiff's personal injury for plaintiff seeks an Attorney with three or more years of experience in New J...