X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (“B&W”) and Philip Morris Inc. (“PM”) seek review of a judgment entered April 1, 1999 by the United States District Courtfor the Western District of Kentucky. See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., No. 3:89CV-0470-S (W.D. Ky. Apr. 1, 1999) (judgment);Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., No. 3:89CV-0470-S (W.D. Ky. Apr. 1, 1999) (findings of fact and conclusions of law) (“B&WOpinion”). B&W appeals the district court’s holding that claims 1, 4, and 11 of U.S. Reissue Patent No. 32,615 (the “Luke patent” or “’615 patent”) were invalid for obviousness over the prior art. [FOOTNOTE 1] PM cross-appeals the district court’s holdings that: (1) claims 1, 4, and 11 of the Luke patent were infringed[FOOTNOTE 2] by the Virginia SlimsSuperSlims (“VSSS”) cigarette manufactured by PM; (2) PM’s infringement was willful up until receipt of oral opinions in March and May of 1989; and (3) claims 1,4, and 11 of the Luke patent were not invalid due to an alleged public use. Because the district court did not err in finding claims 1, 4, and 11 obvious over the priorart, we affirm the district court’s decision that claims 1, 4, and 11 are invalid. Because that decision moots the remaining issues, we do not address the district court’sother invalidity decision or its decisions regarding infringement and willfulness.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More
March 24, 2025 - March 27, 2025
New York, NY

Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.


Learn More

Winkler Kurtz, LLP, a Port Jefferson Station law firm, seeks a Matrimonial Associate Attorney to provide assistance and be involved in all a...


Apply Now ›

NORTHERN NEW JERSEY LAW FIRM WITH PRACTICE LIMITED TO REPRESENTATION OF ACCIDENT VICTIMS AND INJURED WORKERS SEEKS A WORKERS COMPENSATION A...


Apply Now ›

We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...


Apply Now ›