Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Sobien v. Mullin

Where jury found defendant liable for costs incurred by plaintiffs in repairing their wall, which had become exposed to the elements due to defendant's removal of his condemned building, judgment on jury verdict reversed because plaintiffs' easement in wall terminated when wall was rendered useless to either party through no fault of defendant; defendant did not owe plaintiffs a duty to protect wall from the elements and could not be held liable for repair costs.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
OPINION

�1 Appellant, James Mullin, appeals from the judgment entered on the jury verdict finding him liable for the cost incurred by Appellees, Ailisa and Frank Sobien (the Sobiens), in re-framing and siding their end wall, which had become exposed to the elements due to Mr. Mullin’s removal of his condemned building. On appeal, Mr. Mullin claims the trial court erred in refusing his request for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV). We reverse and remand.

�2 This case involves party wall rights between adjoining landowners in the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. The relevant facts are not seriously in dispute. Mr. Mullin has owned the lot located at 876 Progress Street for the past twenty-five years. The Sobiens purchased the adjoining lot numbered as 874 Progress Street in 1995. The buildings on the respective lots date back to the early 1900′s. The building on Mr. Mullin’s lot was built first, and its brick side wall adjacent to the Sobiens’ lot was constructed wholly within Mr. Mullin’s property line. The original owner of the Sobiens’ lot built their residence in such a manner that the interior framing of their north wall butted up against Mr. Mullin’s brick wall using it as a curtain or firewall and thereby encroached upon Mr. Mullin’s property. The structural weight bearing wooden beams ran from front to back, and there was no tie into Mr. Mullin’s side wall. The parties were unable to determine whether at the time of this construction the lots were owned individually or by the same person. However, this information was unnecessary in deciding whether the wall was intended as a party wall because the Sobiens alleged they had acquired prescriptive rights to the continued use of the wall as a protective wall.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
Complex Claims & Litigation Forum 2025
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards 2025
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More
Legalweek New York 2025
March 24, 2025 - March 27, 2025
New York, NY

Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Executive Director State Commission of Investigation

The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...


Apply Now ›
Associate Attorney

We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...


Apply Now ›
Plaintiff Personal Injury Trial Attorney

Rabb, Hamill, P.A, located in Woodbridge, NJ, seeks an experienced NJ licensed Personal Injury Trial attorney. The successful candidate wi...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs