X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Submitted: January 8, 2001

Petitioner Benito Jiminian applied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 2244 for an order authorizing the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. � 2255. In an order filed January 11, 2001, we denied Jiminian’s application, indicating that this opinion would follow.

On December 11, 2000, Benito Jiminian, pro se, applied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. � 2244 for an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. � 2255. In his application, Jiminian conceded that he had a prior � 2255 motion dismissed on the merits and that he could not meet the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s (“AEDPA”) certification requirements for filing a second or successive � 2255 motion. Nonetheless, Jiminian sought to have his case remanded to the district court with instructions that the court consider his present claim under 28 U.S.C. � 2241 on the ground that, if he were not allowed to proceed under � 2241, the AEDPA’s gate-keeping requirements would be unconstitutional as applied to his case. We denied Jiminian’s application in an order filed January 11, 2001. See 28 U.S.C. � 2244(b)(3)(D) (requiring the courts of appeals to grant or deny authorization to file a second or successive � 2255 motion “not later than 30 days after the filing of the motion”). We also stated that this opinion would follow.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
December 02, 2024 - December 03, 2024
Scottsdale, AZ

Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!


Learn More
December 11, 2024
Las Vegas, NV

This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.


Learn More
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More

We are seeking two attorneys with a minimum of two to three years of experience to join our prominent and thriving education law practice in...


Apply Now ›

Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York office for a Real Estate Litigation Associate with three to six years of commerci...


Apply Now ›

Downtown NY property and casualty defense law firm seeks a Litigation Associate with 3+ years' experience to become a part of our team! You ...


Apply Now ›