Sign In
Events
Newsletters
Search

Close

Close Search

Cancel

SEARCH
MY LAW.COMNEW

Power Resource Group, Inc. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas

Public Utility Commission Rule 23.66 is not pre-empted by federal law, and the commission was within its authority to determine that a legally enforceable obligation does not exist unless the qualifying facility is capable of providing energy within 90 days of notifying the utility of its qualifying facility status.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
In this appeal, we must determine whether the Public Utility Commission of Texas erred in interpreting its substantive rule 23.66, governing the obligation of electric utilities to purchase energy and capacity from qualifying facilities. *fn1 Power Resource Group, Inc., challenges the Commission’s refusal to find a requirement in the rule imposing upon utilities an obligation to enter into contracts offered by qualifying facilities incapable of providing energy or capacity within ninety days of such offer.

In Texas, the primary enforcer of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”), a federal statute enacted in part to encourage development of cogeneration facilities as an alternative source of energy, is the Commission. The Commission is authorized to enact rules imposing an obligation upon a utility to purchase power from a QF. See Tex. Util. Code Ann. � 11.002(c) (West Supp. 2002). As contemplated by PURPA, the Commission enacted rule 23.66(d)(1)(C) to regulate the relationship between utilities and QFs. In implementing and interpreting its rule, then, the Commission determined that it could best serve the purposes of PURPA by imposing an obligation upon a utility to purchase energy-but not contract for it-within ninety days of notification of the availability of such energy from a QF. In so doing, the Commission struck a balance between insuring a market for QFs by encouraging the development of energy and requiring utilities to purchase that energy.

The question on appeal, then, is whether the Commission misinterpreted the rule or it is otherwise invalid. In six points of error, Power Resource contests the district court’s judgment (i) affirming the Commission’s interpretation of rule 23.66 and (ii) granting appellees’ *fn2 motions for summary judgment. Holding the Commission’s interpretation of rule 23.66 was reasonable and Power Resource’s claims to be without merit, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

Trending Stories

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

LEARN MORE

More From ALM

Premium Subscription
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Team Accounts
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Bundle Subscriptions
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Go to CLE Center
GlobeSt. Women of Influence (WOI) 2024
July 22, 2024 - July 24, 2024
Lake Tahoe, CA

GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.


Learn More
New York Legal Awards 2024
September 05, 2024
New York, NY

The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.


Learn More
African Legal Awards 2024
September 06, 2024
Johannesburg

The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.


Learn More
Go to Events Go to Webcasts
Labor & Employment Associate Los Angeles

Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the Los Angeles, CA office for an associate in our Labor & Employment Department. The ...


Apply Now ›
Associate Attorney

Blume Forte Fried Zerres and Molinari 1 Main Street Chatham, NJ 07945Prominent Morris County Law Firm with a state-wide personal injury prac...


Apply Now ›
eHealth Exchange In-house Legal Counsel

Reports to: Executive Director FLSA Status: Exempt, Full Time Supervisory Responsibility: N/A Location: Remote Compensation Range: $21...


Apply Now ›
Go to Lawjobs
Lawyers of Distinction
06/27/2024
The American Lawyer

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
SMGQ Law
06/21/2024
Daily Business Review

Full Page Announcement


View Announcement ›
Blume Forte Fried Zerres & Molinari
06/14/2024
New Jersey Law Journal

Professional Announcement


View Announcement ›
Go to Professional Announcements