X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Submitted: February 1, 2002

Richard Ridolfi (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) reversing the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) and denying his reinstatement petition because he did not meet his burden of proving that he was either totally disabled or that he was capable of performing sedentary work but that no such work was available.

Claimant suffered a work-related low back injury on August 15, 1985, while employed by the School District of Philadelphia (Employer). Employer accepted liability for his disability beginning March 14, 1986. On January 26, 1988, the parties entered into a Supplemental Agreement which stated that Claimant was entitled to partial disability benefits at a rate of $336 per week for 500 weeks. On April 18, 1988, the parties entered into a Stipulation of Fact agreeing that Claimant had sufficiently recovered to perform modified work and such work was available to him as of March 26, 1987. Neither the Supplemental Agreement nor the Stipulation of Fact indicated Claimant’s current earning capacity, but the Stipulation stated that “modified jobs available to the claimant as of March 27, 1987 did not pay an average weekly wage sufficient to reduce claimant’s entitlement to the maximum partial disability rate of $336 per week.”

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
February 24, 2025 - February 26, 2025
Las Vegas, NV

This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.


Learn More
March 24, 2025
New York, NY

Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.


Learn More
March 24, 2025 - March 27, 2025
New York, NY

Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.


Learn More

McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...


Apply Now ›

**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...


Apply Now ›

Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...


Apply Now ›