X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Argued: January 11, 2001

Appeal from a conviction after a guilty plea in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Christopher F. Droney, Judge), to one count of conspiracy to distribute narcotics. Appellant contends that his guilty plea should be vacated as not fully informed because the district court’s description of the government’s evidentiary burden regarding the charges against him was erroneous under the Supreme Court’s subsequent Apprendi decision. We affirm because the facts do not warrant reversal on plain error review.

Donald Mims appeals from his conviction after a plea of guilty before Judge Droney to one count of conspiracy to distribute narcotics in violation of 21 U.S.C. �� 841(a)(1), 846. Appellant contends that his conviction should be vacated because, when he entered his plea, he was not correctly informed about the law pertinent to the charges against him. In particular, he argues that, in light of the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the district court erred in telling him that the government had to prove his involvement with only a “detectable” quantity of heroin to obtain a conviction by a jury and expose him to a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. We hold that, although the district court’s statement was inaccurate under Apprendi, the mistake was not such as to call for reversal on plain error review. We therefore affirm.

 
Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.

More From ALM

With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
September 18, 2024 - September 19, 2024
Dallas, TX

Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies


Learn More
September 24, 2024
Chicago, IL

Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.


Learn More
September 23, 2024 - September 25, 2024
Chicago, IL

WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.


Learn More

Public Finance Attorney wanted for established New Jersey bond counsel firm located in Cranford, New Jersey. New Jersey municipal and schoo...


Apply Now ›

Experienced tax attorney to assist growing corporate practice. Candidate should have a minimum of 7 years' experience in corporate and par...


Apply Now ›

University of California College of the Law, San Francisco ( UC Law SF, formerly, UC Hastings ), located in downtown San Francisco, seeks...


Apply Now ›