Product Review: Microsoft Surface 3 Tablet
The ability to run a full version of Windows 8.1 makes the Surface 3 a compelling choice for lawyers.
June 29, 2015 at 01:36 AM
7 minute read
For a long time, expressing admiration for one of Microsoft Corp.'s Windows RT tablets, the original Surface RT or its sequel, the Surface 2, was like saying how much you enjoy paying income taxes: You don't. The tablets were well-built and incorporated some great ideas, such as an innovative keyboard cover, but because they ran on Windows RT, a stunted version of Windows that never attracted many software developers, they suffered from a very limited selection of apps.
With the new Surface 3, however, Microsoft changes all that. By ditching Windows RT and enabling full Windows 8.1 compatibility, Microsoft has built arguably the strongest iPad competitor on the market. (Both tablets start at $499 but require spending a couple hundred dollars more before they are work-friendly.) Indeed, in the three weeks I used the Surface 3, I barely touched my iPad.
The best way to think of the Surface 3 is as a smaller version of Microsoft's Surface Pro 3, a terrific Windows-based tablet in its own right, but a costly one. The Pro effectively requires an investment that surpasses $1,100 for a mid-line version with 128 gigabytes of storage and a keyboard cover that is all but mandatory for professional use. (There is a low-end 64-gigabyte Pro, but it really isn't suitable for work, since Windows and Microsoft Office eats up a fair chunk of that space.) The Surface 3 retains the solid construction of its bigger sibling, and it's really not that much smaller, with a screen that measures 10.8 inches, compared with the Pro's 12 inches. In fact, Surface 3's slightly smaller size is a bit of an advantage, making it more portable than the Pro, and lighter, too, at 1.37 pounds, compared with the Pro's 1.76 pounds.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
5 minute readA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute readArnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
3 minute readGrabbing Market Share From Rivals, Law Firms Ramped Up Group Lateral Hires
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250