Law Firms That Police the Police
As calls for more accountability in law enforcement have grown, law firms pro bono efforts have stepped up.
July 02, 2017 at 12:00 AM
25 minute read
Calls for transparency and accountability in law enforcement have grown louder in the years since the police shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, inspired a protest movement that spread across the country. Pro bono lawyers from large law firms are playing key roles in the effort to shine a light on police departments and their practices.
Some firms have offered their expertise to panels investigating allegations of police misconduct. Partners at Hinshaw & Culbertson and Mayer Brown, for example, co-led a police accountability task force in Chicago appointed by Mayor Rahm Emanuel that issued recommendations to improve police culture and its relationships with the community. Mayer Brown also worked on a similar effort in Fairfax, Virginia. In San Francisco, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius supported a Blue Ribbon Panel investigation of police bias, which found the SFPD needed more oversight and robust reform.
Other firms are tackling police misconduct via litigation to overturn wrongful convictions—often in conjunction with the Innocence Project, an organization that works to free men and women innocent of the crimes for which they've been incarcerated. At Covington & Burling, for instance, a team of lawyers is representing a former prisoner in New Orleans, Reginald Adams, who spent 34 years in prison for the murder of a police officer's wife in 1979. Adams was released in 2014 after the Innocence Project demonstrated that detectives had traced the murder weapon to a different suspect. With Covington's help, Adams sued the city of New Orleans in U.S. district court, seeking compensatory and punitive damages for alleged Brady violations related to the suppressed evidence; the case settled in June 2017, with the terms of the agreement under seal.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJay Clayton, Ex-SEC Chief and Sullivan & Cromwell Lawyer, Eyed For Manhattan US Attorney's Office
Legal Speak's 'Sidebar with Saul' Part II: GOP Pols Push Misinformation, Cohen Keeps It Together
1 minute readLegal Speak: Aaron Sorkin This Is Not - Trump Trial with Emily Saul (Part 1)
2 minute readPillsbury Partner Representing Sean 'Diddy' Combs Following Homeland Security Raid
Trending Stories
- 1Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 2NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 3A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 4Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
- 5State Bar of Georgia Presents Access to Justice Pro Bono Awards
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250