Milbank Seeks Secretarial Cuts Ahead of HQ Relocation
Milbank issued a statement saying it would offer voluntary buyout packages to its legal secretaries in New York.
October 02, 2017 at 02:40 PM
9 minute read
A little more than 12 months ago, New York-based Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy confirmed that it would give up its longtime digs in the city's Financial District for a new office at 55 Hudson Yards, a development being constructed on Manhattan's West Side.
This week, in anticipation of that move, Milbank issued a statement saying it would offer voluntary buyout packages to its legal secretaries in New York. In the statement, first obtained by Above the Law, the firm said it would start using a “team-based legal support staff model”—or secretarial pools—rather than permanently assigned relationships between lawyers and their secretaries.
“Milbank is transitioning to a team-based legal support staff model, which is in widespread use throughout the industry,” the firm said. “To facilitate this change, the firm has offered its legal secretaries in New York a generous voluntary package that includes an incentive payment, severance commensurate with years of service and paid health benefits.”
Notably, Milbank did not state explicitly that it would reduce its support staff. Instead, the firm said that it “expects the majority of its legal secretaries will move with the firm to Hudson Yards.”
Milbank declined to comment further through a firm spokeswoman.
These days, however, many large firms are shedding administrative staffers and changing the relationships between lawyers and support workers, according to law firm consultants.
“Legal support positions are changing as law firms focus on streamlining operations efficiencies and meeting the needs of cost-conscious clients,” said Jamy Sullivan, executive director of legal search firm Robert Half Legal, in an email. “Paralegal and legal secretary teams are being restructured and they are being asked to support multiple attorneys or practice groups.”
Other changes are also afoot, she said.
“Legal support professionals are taking on more responsibility in addition to their current roles, such as handling accounting and HR duties. As a cost-effective measure, paralegals are doing more work that doesn't require a licensed lawyer and was previously assigned to junior associates,” Sullivan said. “And, as law firms continually search for ways to cut costs, hybrid or blended paralegal/legal secretary roles have become more common.”
Gone are the days of single lawyer and secretary pairs, as are the times when law firms had the requisite office space to support such a dynamic.
“At most firms, there is no expectation of one-to-one support,” Sullivan wrote. “Attorneys have become more tech-savvy and self-sufficient in terms of their basic legal support needs. Technology also is allowing attorneys to handle tasks that they once delegated to legal secretaries.”
Sullivan noted that at many firms, she's seeing attorney-to-legal-secretary-staffing ratios of 4:1 or 5:1.
“At larger law firms, for example, it's normal to see lower ratios—2:1 or 3:1—for partner-level support and higher ratios—6:1 or 7:1—at the associate level,” Sullivan added.
Kent Zimmermann, a legal consultant at the Zeughauser Group, agrees that the trend is less human help for the lawyers. The “general trend” has reduced assistants, particularly since younger lawyers are comfortable with emails, their own document production and scheduling, he said in an email.
And then there are the firms looking outside their four walls for lower-priced support.
“Many firms are going to offsite supplemental back- and middle-office support,” Zimmermann said. He noted that Kentucky, Tampa, Ireland and the Philippines are places around the world where large firms now have offsite, back-office operations.
A little more than 12 months ago, New York-based
This week, in anticipation of that move, Milbank issued a statement saying it would offer voluntary buyout packages to its legal secretaries in
“Milbank is transitioning to a team-based legal support staff model, which is in widespread use throughout the industry,” the firm said. “To facilitate this change, the firm has offered its legal secretaries in
Notably, Milbank did not state explicitly that it would reduce its support staff. Instead, the firm said that it “expects the majority of its legal secretaries will move with the firm to Hudson Yards.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGlobal 200 Firms Gaining Deal Share Amid Race to Build in India
Trending Stories
- 1Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 2Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 3'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 4Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
- 5Florida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250