PwC: Law Firms Are Falling Behind on Technology, Client Expectations
A new report by the Big Four accounting giant has found that Big Law firms are failing to adequately invest in cutting-edge technologies.
October 16, 2017 at 12:05 AM
3 minute read
A new report by PricewaterhouseCoopers says that Big Law firms are not keeping pace with cutting-edge technologies and growing client expectations.
In a survey of more than half of the U.K.'s 100-largest law firms by revenue, PwC found that 70 percent have invested in client collaboration tools and about 40 percent use automated document production software.
But just 11 percent of firms surveyed by PwC utilize big data and predictive analytics, while more sophisticated technologies such as smart contracts and blockchain—a tool that allows information to be shared and updated across a network—are “barely featuring.”
David Snell, who heads PwC's law firm advisory group, said that firms need to take “fundamental action” to improve such areas as client service delivery, business support and recruitment in an increasingly competitive market.
“Firms need to be more agile in embracing emerging technologies, which will ultimately help them achieve more effective staffing levels and react faster to changing client demands,” he said. “This will require significant investment, and firms need to think carefully as to how this will be funded.”
The report also said that firms must tackle workplace management issues in order to “re-balance” performance and profitability, which has become squeezed by rising staff costs and flattening demand for legal services.
PwC has in recent years invested heavily in its own legal services arm, PwC Legal, which now employs more than 3,200 attorneys across 90 countries. The American Lawyer reported last month that PwC is launching a U.S. law firm business.
While PwC and other alternative service providers are becoming increasingly significant players in the legal market, a recent survey by research company Acritas found that they still lack the brand strength of traditional law firms.
Acritas' latest global elite brand index, which was published last week, was headed by Baker McKenzie for the eighth consecutive year. Baker McKenzie's brand is now twice as strong as any law firm's, according to Acritas data, which is based on interviews with more than 1,000 in-house counsel at billion-dollar organizations across 50 countries.
EY was the highest-placed alternative legal service provider in Acritas' global elite ranking, in 77th place. But in another sign that suggests the Big Four will become increasingly serious competitors to Big Law firms, EY would rank among the top 20 elite law firm brands if the responses were limited to in-house lawyers under the age of 40.
Chris Johnson is based in London, where he writes about global law firms and the business of law. Contact him at [email protected]. On Twitter: @chris_t_johnson.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAbout to Become a Partner? Here's What to Know About Your Newfound Wealth
10 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Chief Business Development and Marketing Officer From EY
2 minute readGibson Dunn Lands EY GC for New Practice Advising Accounting Firms
Bonuses and Beyond: Law Firms Wrap Up Lucrative Year With Record-High Rewards
Trending Stories
- 1Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 2Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 3Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 43rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
- 5Latest Class of Court Officers Sworn into Service in New York
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250