Foley & Lardner, Gardere Mull Potential Merger
The two firms, which held talks about a tie-up last year, have recently resumed discussions.
October 31, 2017 at 06:11 PM
4 minute read
Foley & Lardner and Gardere Wynne Sewell have become the latest pair of large law firms to discuss the possibility of a union before year's end.
Two sources familiar with the operations of both firms confirmed the talks, with one individual claiming that Gardere's partnership had voted to approve the deal. The other source said that Foley & Lardner had previously discussed a combination with the Texas-based firm last year.
Foley & Lardner spokeswoman Jill Chanen confirmed that the 840-lawyer firm and Gardere were evaluating the prospects of a combination, one that would bring together firms that had 2016 gross revenues of $671 million and $151.5 million, respectively.
“We continuously evaluate opportunities that will advance the interests of our clients and the firm,” the firm said in a statement provided to The American Lawyer. “As part of these efforts, we have engaged in discussions with Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP about the mutual benefits for clients that may stem from a combination. As the discussions are still underway, and no final decision has been reached, we do not have any further information to share at this time.”
Brian Dare, chief marketing officer for Gardere, said in a statement that his 212-lawyer firm is constantly evaluating various opportunities in the market.
“A lot of people are interested in firms like Gardere that have a strong reputation in Texas and have been here for a while,” he said in a statement.
Internet domain name records show that the website www.foleygardere.com was registered anonymously on Tuesday.
Earlier this month, Gardere absorbed a five-lawyer commercial arbitration and litigation boutique in Mexico City called Bufete Hernández Romo. Gardere, which has watched its profits rise amid a downturn in the U.S. energy market, was formed in 1909 in a small town east of Dallas called Wills Point, Texas. The firm adopted its current name in 2000, five years after the merger of legacy firms Gardere & Wynne and Sewell & Riggs.
In late 2015, Foley & Lardner and British firm Eversheds broke off discussions about a potential combination. (Eversheds subsequently found a merger partner in Sutherland Asbill & Brennan.) Earlier this year, Foley & Lardner and New York's Friedman Kaplan Seiler & Adelman talked about a potential tie-up, according to The American Lawyer.
Foley & Lardner, which in September celebrated its 175th anniversary, is led by CEO Jay Rothman, who was elected to the role in early 2011. The firm's COO, Blane Prescott, joined the firm in 2014 from Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, which he helped guide through a series of mergers in his previous position at what was then called Hildebrandt Baker Robbins. (Prescott spoke with The American Lawyer in late 2010 about his decision to leave the legal consulting world for law firm management.)
While Foley & Lardner has not done a major merger in some time, the firm does have a history of combinations, having absorbed three Florida firms between 1985 and 1991 in Jacksonville, Orlando and Tampa, while also acquiring Los Angeles-based Weissburg & Aronson in 1996.
The talks between Foley & Lardner and Gardere come as two other large firms—Bryan Cave and the U.K.'s Berwin Leighton Paisner—move toward a potential combination that could be finalized by Jan. 1, 2018. That deal could cap what might be a record year for legal services combinations, according to data analyzed by legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew Year Brings New Partner Hires for White & Case, Venable, Winston & Strawn
3 minute readBaker McKenzie, Jones Day, Reed Smith Make 2025 Partner Promotions
Why Hogan Lovells and Perkins Coie Reversed, Will Now Pay Out Special Bonuses to Associates
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Deal Watch: Latham, Paul Weiss, Debevoise Land on Year-End Big Deals. Plus, Mixed Messages for 2025 M&A
- 2Bathroom Recording Leads to Lawyer's Disbarment: Disciplinary Roundup
- 3Conn. Supreme Court: Workers' Comp Insurance Cancellations Must Be Unambiguous
- 4To Avoid Conflict, NYAG Hands Probe Into Inmate's Beating Death to Syracuse-Area DA
- 5Scripture-Quoting Employee Sues Company for Supporting LGBTQ Pride
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250