Study Shows Despite Plethora of Policies, Big Law Still Struggles With Gender Diversity
A new report released Tuesday by McKinsey & Co. and Thomson Reuters Corp. unveils some stark difference in how men and women view gender equity in the Big Law workplace.
October 31, 2017 at 10:06 AM
4 minute read
Law firms across the country have implemented countless policies and programs specifically aimed at fixing the legal industry's gender diversity problem.
But those policies are not necessarily translating into transformative changes within the industry, according to a new study released Tuesday by management consultancy McKinsey & Co. and Thomson Reuters Corp.
The study, called Women in Law Firms, is part of McKinsey and LeanIn.Org's broader Women in the Workplace 2017 initiative that looks to provide various industries with the research needed to promote women's leadership and gender equality.
Over the last year, McKinsey gathered data from 23 law firms, primarily from Am Law 100 firms, regarding their talent pipeline, as well as gender and diversity policies and programs. The study then collected survey responses from more than 2,500 lawyers about their experiences in the legal industry on issues such as gender, opportunity, career track and work-life matters.
The study found that men and women start at law firms in equal numbers and remain relatively well represented as young associates. But this picture changes dramatically as women progress to more senior levels within a firm. The McKinsey study found that women are 29 percent less likely to reach the first level of partnership in law firms than men, while women make up only 19 percent of equity partners and occupy only 25 percent of executive leadership positions.
Interestingly, however, the study noted that over the last year of its research, women left law firms with less frequency than their male counterparts, until they hit the equity partnership tier. At that level, women were 43 percent more likely than men to leave law firms, according to data collected within the last year.
This high rate of attrition by senior women lawyers has made firms look to the drawing board to try and craft policies and programs focused on retaining female talent.
“I think for me the big 'Aha's' were on the positive side,” said Charlotte Rushton, managing director for large and midsize law firms in the U.S. at Thomson Reuters and an executive co-sponsor of its Transforming Women's Leadership in the Law initiative.
Law firms, more so than corporations, have led the way in implementing diversity policies and programs such as parental leave and child care support.
About 91 percent of law firms surveyed by McKinsey offer maternity leave that exceeds government requirements, and 83 percent of those surveyed offer paternity leave that also goes beyond federal minimums. All law firms surveyed also offer the option of working on a part-time or reduced schedule.
But, Rushton added, “those policies and approaches aren't translating into positive results.”
An overwhelming majority of lawyers surveyed said that they feared the potential consequences of taking advantage of such programs. Seventy-five percent of women and 74 percent of men said they believed that participating in a part-time or reduced schedule program would have negative consequences for their careers.
The study also found that there was a large difference between law firms' commitment to solving the gender diversity issue among men and women.
Only 36 percent of women believe that gender diversity is a priority for their firm, according to the study, which noted that 62 percent of men believe that it is a matter of import. Less than half of women said their firm was doing what it takes to improve gender diversity, compared with more than two-thirds of men who said the same.
“That's obviously a big dichotomy between having all of these policies and processes in place, but what people feel is a priority,” Rushton said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDeal Watch: Latham, Skadden, Covington, Troutman, Fried Frank and Davis Polk Lead $10B+ Deals
8 minute readKing & Spalding E-Discovery Director Jumps to Nebraska Women-Owned Firm
4 minute readPaul Weiss, Trailblazer for US Firms in China, to Close Beijing Office
3 minute readEmbracing Hybrid Work, ArentFox Schiff Downsizes LA Digs
Trending Stories
- 1The Pusillanimous Press
- 2Contract Lifecycle Management Company ContractPodAi Unveils Leah Drive
- 3'Great News' for Businesses? Judge Halts Transparency Mandate
- 4Consilio Announces ‘Native AI Review,’ Expanding Its Gen AI E-Discovery Offerings
- 5Federal Judge Hits US With $227,000 Sanction for Discovery Misconduct
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250