BakerHostetler Partners' Scary Advice (+More)
Here's what's catching my eye: The scary, the extravagant and the ugly.
November 06, 2017 at 02:29 PM
11 minute read
Here's what's catching my eye: The scary, the extravagant and the ugly.
BakerHostetler partners tells Trump how to shut down Mueller's investigation. At first, I thought it was a joke. But we're not remotely close to April Fools' Day. Last week was, however, a celebration of ghost and goblins, and the advice these two Big Law partners gave to President Trump is downright scary.
Writing in The Wall Street Journal, BakerHostetler partners David Rivkin and Lee Casey propose that President Trump “can end this madness” of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation “by immediately issuing a blanket presidential pardon to anyone involved in supposed collusion with Russia or Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign, to anyone involved with Russian acquisition of an American uranium company during the Obama administration, and to anyone for any offense that has been investigated by Mr. Mueller's office.”
It's that simple: If Trump uses his presidential power to pardon whoever has been implicated, Mueller can't do his job and will have to shut down the investigation. Rivkin and Casey write: “The president himself would be covered by the blanket pardon we recommend, but the pardon power does not extend to impeachment.”
The advice is coldly technical and cynical, but Rivkin and Casey wrap it in noble cloth. They claim that the Mueller's investigation has been biased from the get-go and that the charges represent “weaponization of criminal law.” Instead of an investigation by special counsel, they propose that questions of interference in U.S. elections by Russia be investigated by Congress.
All this would be amusing as a policy debate at some Federalist Society event if it weren't for the very real possibility that Trump might take up the advice. After all, it fits with the ethos of the White House Counsel's office, where bare technical adherence to the law is all that matters. (Fun fact: Even John Yoo, the author of the infamous “torture memos” during the W administration, writes that a blanket pardon, while legal, is a crummy idea.)
Then what would happen? The Democrats will scream and holler, and the Republicans (with the exception of those on their way out) will sit quietly, and Trump could get his way. It would throw a monkey wrench into the whole system and do serious damage to the presidency and our trust in government—essentially fulfilling Stephen Bannon's nihilistic vision.
Gee, thanks Messrs. Rivkin and Casey. You're giving lawyers a swell reputation.
A shiny trinket for an ex-S&C associate. Sullivan & Cromwell might be fabulously prestigious and lucrative, but I can assure you that not even its biggest, fattest rainmaker could afford what one of its former peon associates is buying.
Joseph Tsai, a one-time S&C corporate associate turned Alibaba co-founder, is awarding himself with a little trophy: A 49 percent stake in the Nets, which, according to The New York Times, is the seventh-most valuable team of the NBA franchise.
It could end up being a decent investment, but Tsai's acquisition of the Nets seems to be largely a toy project. The Times says that Tsai will be buying the stake with his own money (he's worth $9 billion, according to Forbes), and that he will be hands-off (he'll keep his day job at Alibaba and won't be involved in the basketball or business sides of the Nets).
So why all this effort to acquire this particular toy? Well, Tsai has an interest in sports, reports the Times, “dating back to his time as a lacrosse player at Yale.”
How quaint that it all goes back to his college days. In any case, I'm pretty sure Tsai isn't feeling too bad that he didn't stick it out at S&C.
Ugliest on campus award: Three go to law schools. Law schools and other academic institutions usually fight to be on those top 10 list, but being on this list is no badge of honor.
We're not talking about academic reputation, but aesthetics. AD (or Architectural Digest for you old-school readers) recently came out with its most ugliest buildings in higher education—and law schools were well-represented. Actually, over-represented. Law schools comprised three out of the eight structure on America's ugliest university architecture list. And they are truly breathtaking.
Here they are in all their glory:
University of Baltimore School of Law
University of Maine School of Law
University of Iowa College of Law
Hat tip: TaxProf blog.
Here's what's catching my eye: The scary, the extravagant and the ugly.
BakerHostetler partners tells Trump how to shut down Mueller's investigation. At first, I thought it was a joke. But we're not remotely close to April Fools' Day. Last week was, however, a celebration of ghost and goblins, and the advice these two Big Law partners gave to President Trump is downright scary.
Writing in The Wall Street Journal, BakerHostetler partners David Rivkin and Lee Casey propose that President Trump “can end this madness” of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation “by immediately issuing a blanket presidential pardon to anyone involved in supposed collusion with Russia or Russians during the 2016 presidential campaign, to anyone involved with Russian acquisition of an American uranium company during the Obama administration, and to anyone for any offense that has been investigated by Mr. Mueller's office.”
It's that simple: If Trump uses his presidential power to pardon whoever has been implicated, Mueller can't do his job and will have to shut down the investigation. Rivkin and Casey write: “The president himself would be covered by the blanket pardon we recommend, but the pardon power does not extend to impeachment.”
The advice is coldly technical and cynical, but Rivkin and Casey wrap it in noble cloth. They claim that the Mueller's investigation has been biased from the get-go and that the charges represent “weaponization of criminal law.” Instead of an investigation by special counsel, they propose that questions of interference in U.S. elections by Russia be investigated by Congress.
All this would be amusing as a policy debate at some Federalist Society event if it weren't for the very real possibility that Trump might take up the advice. After all, it fits with the ethos of the White House Counsel's office, where bare technical adherence to the law is all that matters. (Fun fact: Even John Yoo, the author of the infamous “torture memos” during the W administration, writes that a blanket pardon, while legal, is a crummy idea.)
Then what would happen? The Democrats will scream and holler, and the Republicans (with the exception of those on their way out) will sit quietly, and Trump could get his way. It would throw a monkey wrench into the whole system and do serious damage to the presidency and our trust in government—essentially fulfilling Stephen Bannon's nihilistic vision.
Gee, thanks Messrs. Rivkin and Casey. You're giving lawyers a swell reputation.
A shiny trinket for an ex-S&C associate.
Joseph Tsai, a one-time S&C corporate associate turned Alibaba co-founder, is awarding himself with a little trophy: A 49 percent stake in the Nets, which, according to The
It could end up being a decent investment, but Tsai's acquisition of the Nets seems to be largely a toy project. The Times says that Tsai will be buying the stake with his own money (he's worth $9 billion, according to Forbes), and that he will be hands-off (he'll keep his day job at Alibaba and won't be involved in the basketball or business sides of the Nets).
So why all this effort to acquire this particular toy? Well, Tsai has an interest in sports, reports the Times, “dating back to his time as a lacrosse player at Yale.”
How quaint that it all goes back to his college days. In any case, I'm pretty sure Tsai isn't feeling too bad that he didn't stick it out at S&C.
Ugliest on campus award: Three go to law schools. Law schools and other academic institutions usually fight to be on those top 10 list, but being on this list is no badge of honor.
We're not talking about academic reputation, but aesthetics. AD (or Architectural Digest for you old-school readers) recently came out with its most ugliest buildings in higher education—and law schools were well-represented. Actually, over-represented. Law schools comprised three out of the eight structure on America's ugliest university architecture list. And they are truly breathtaking.
Here they are in all their glory:
Hat tip: TaxProf blog.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250