Following 'Mansfield Rule' Popularity, Diversity Lab Touts 2 New Hackathons
Having successfully pushed law firms to adopt policies helping women rise in the ranks of Big Law, the Diversity Lab has planned another initiative next year that hopes to enlist 88 law firms and in-house legal departments.
November 13, 2017 at 02:58 PM
17 minute read
There's a good chance that if you mentioned the word “hackathon” to someone in the legal profession two years ago, they might not know what that word meant and all that it would soon encompass for Big Law.
But since the veritable success of the 2016 Women in Law Hackathon that produced the widely implemented Mansfield Rule, the Diversity Lab, an organization dedicated to closing the gender and diversity gap in the legal profession, is poised to announce this week that it will be holding two new hackathon sessions in 2018.
“There's just been an outpour of interest in continuing to try new things,” said Caren Ulrich Stacy, CEO of the Diversity Lab.
The first hackathon will run from February to June, in partnership with Harvard Law School Executive Education, while Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law and the University of California, Hastings College of the Law will host a second session running from July through November. Bloomberg Law is facilitating the series in collaboration with Diversity Lab.
Rather than focusing solely on the issue of women in the law, Ulrich said that next year's hackathons will focus on the broader topic of diversity and inclusion within the legal profession. Also, for the first time, the hackathons will be open to in-house legal departments.
Participants will be divided into a team of eight law firm and legal department leaders who will meet at a kick-off event and then work together virtually during the following three-to-four months to develop innovative ideas designed to address pipeline issues, as well as the retention and advancement of diverse lawyers in the legal profession.
Teams in the second hackathon session will have the opportunity to either develop new ideas or “hack” other ideas from previous sessions and continue to develop them, Ulrich said. The teams will then present their ideas at a pitch session at the conclusion of their respective hackathon.
Ulrich said the decision to include legal departments in this iteration was made because general counsel face many of the same issues that law firms now face in terms of retaining diverse talent. Given the recent diversity demands that general counsel are placing on law firms, these hackathon sessions will give both sides the opportunity to work in tandem to create innovative solutions to fix this common issue, Ulrich said.
“Instead of just saying, 'Do better,' [they're] helping law firms to think through how to do better and then partnering with law firms to increase diversity and inclusion for them and then also looking internally at the legal department,” added Ulrich, who has previously held positions at Arnold & Porter, Cooley, McGuireWoods and Weil, Gotshal & Manges.
As of Monday, Ulrich said 16 legal departments, including representatives from 3M Co., Amazon.com Inc., Bank of America Corp., Facebook Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and 41 law firms, including new Am Law 100 participants like Shearman & Sterling and Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, have already committed to attending one of the two hackathons next year.
“There are so many law firms and legal departments now that are seemingly wanting to try something new,” Ulrich said. “They understand that the things we've been doing to boost diversity and inclusion either haven't worked or haven't worked fast enough, and so now they're seemingly OK with trying something and failing, which is a really good first step.”
There's a good chance that if you mentioned the word “hackathon” to someone in the legal profession two years ago, they might not know what that word meant and all that it would soon encompass for Big Law.
But since the veritable success of the 2016 Women in Law Hackathon that produced the widely implemented Mansfield Rule, the Diversity Lab, an organization dedicated to closing the gender and diversity gap in the legal profession, is poised to announce this week that it will be holding two new hackathon sessions in 2018.
“There's just been an outpour of interest in continuing to try new things,” said Caren Ulrich Stacy, CEO of the Diversity Lab.
The first hackathon will run from February to June, in partnership with
Rather than focusing solely on the issue of women in the law, Ulrich said that next year's hackathons will focus on the broader topic of diversity and inclusion within the legal profession. Also, for the first time, the hackathons will be open to in-house legal departments.
Participants will be divided into a team of eight law firm and legal department leaders who will meet at a kick-off event and then work together virtually during the following three-to-four months to develop innovative ideas designed to address pipeline issues, as well as the retention and advancement of diverse lawyers in the legal profession.
Teams in the second hackathon session will have the opportunity to either develop new ideas or “hack” other ideas from previous sessions and continue to develop them, Ulrich said. The teams will then present their ideas at a pitch session at the conclusion of their respective hackathon.
Ulrich said the decision to include legal departments in this iteration was made because general counsel face many of the same issues that law firms now face in terms of retaining diverse talent. Given the recent diversity demands that general counsel are placing on law firms, these hackathon sessions will give both sides the opportunity to work in tandem to create innovative solutions to fix this common issue, Ulrich said.
“Instead of just saying, 'Do better,' [they're] helping law firms to think through how to do better and then partnering with law firms to increase diversity and inclusion for them and then also looking internally at the legal department,” added Ulrich, who has previously held positions at
As of Monday, Ulrich said 16 legal departments, including representatives from 3M Co.,
“There are so many law firms and legal departments now that are seemingly wanting to try something new,” Ulrich said. “They understand that the things we've been doing to boost diversity and inclusion either haven't worked or haven't worked fast enough, and so now they're seemingly OK with trying something and failing, which is a really good first step.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250