Law Firm Associate Sees #MeAt14 Take on Harassment
Parker Poe's Cat Lawson started a Twitter campaign last week that quickly went viral in response to sexual misconduct allegations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.
November 16, 2017 at 05:30 PM
11 minute read
“Can't consent at 14. Not in Alabama. Not anywhere. #MeAt14,” read the caption that Catherine Lawson posted above a photo of her teenage self on Twitter last week.
The Nov. 9 social media post by Lawson, a third-year litigation associate at Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein, came in response to the news of sexual misconduct allegations against Alabama U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore, who The Washington Post reported that day had initiated a sexual encounter with a 14-year-old girl when he was a 32-year-old district attorney.
Within a day of tweeting out her photo, Lawson's #MeAt14 was trending on social media with people sharing photos of themselves along with descriptions of their young lives and underscoring their inability to understand, let alone consent, to a relationship with an adult. Some people also opened up and shared their stories of abuse at 14.
Lawson, now 30 and a registered Republican living in Raleigh, North Carolina, spoke with The American Lawyer about why she started the #MeAt14 social media push and what still needs to be done to keep the conversation about sexual abuse and harassment moving forward.
“This is not a political issue,” Lawson said. “This is just a common value issue.”
Where did this idea come from and why did you decide to put it out there on social media?
Last week, The Washington Post article came out and it was this incredibly well-sourced piece that was really disturbing, detailing all kinds of alleged abuse by Moore. And while the story itself was really disturbing, for me what was worse were the number of people who were willing to defend the behavior that was being reported. People we willing to come out and say that it was possible that those relationships were consensual or to say that it wasn't something we should really care about.
For me, that's just not true. I thought that sharing a picture of myself from when I was 14 would kind of illustrate that there's no acceptable version of this story. Kids can't consent to relationships with grown adults under any circumstance. So I thought up the hashtag and went from there.
Obviously, the hashtag took off like a firestorm after that with people sharing photos and descriptions of themselves at 14. What did you think of the overall reaction to it?
I just think that there's a larger conversation that's happening right now around abuse and exploitation, whether it's in the technology industry, Hollywood or politics. This is something that we're learning happens a lot—and a lot more often than people realize. People are beginning to feel comfortable coming forward with their stories and their own experiences of abuse and exploitation.
What's been so extraordinary to watch has been people not only posting pictures of themselves, but to also tell their stories. Stories of childhoods that were innocent and protected, but also to just share their stories of abuse. That's just shown incredible vulnerability from a lot of different people.
What's been the reaction from your co-workers or colleagues in the Big Law world?
They've been completely supportive. I'm really lucky to work with people who understand that there's a distinction between what I do personally and what I do at work. This is something I did personally and they've just been completely supportive.
What do you plan on doing with this new platform? Do you have political aspirations or want to start a nonprofit or some other kind of advocacy group?
At the moment I'm content with where I am. I think honestly this is a conversation that has to be had by a lot more people than just me. Whatever platform I might've had was amplified so much by other women like [“The Daily Show” co-creator] Lizz Winstead, Alyssa Milano and Katie Couric and all the other just normal people who shared their own stories. I hope that the conversation keeps happening. What role I do or don't have in that [discussion] honestly isn't that important to me right now.
Obviously, there's been a lot of conversation on a national scale right now about instances of harassment, and Big Law hasn't necessarily been immune from that. There have been stories about gender-based discrimination and harassment. Have you experienced any kind of objectification or bias, or have you heard from other women in Big Law who have?
I think we'd be kidding ourselves if women didn't have those stories to tell. I think that anytime you have power that's concentrated in a nontransparent, nonaccountable fashion you're going to have abuse. I consider myself incredibly lucky that has not been my experience. I have worked with men and women who have looked out for me, who have mentored me and supported me. I'm grateful for that. I also think that it's a really sad thing that that's something I'm thankful for. That should be the norm for everyone, and not just for a minority of people.
All interviews are condensed and edited for style, grammar and clarity.
“Can't consent at 14. Not in Alabama. Not anywhere. #MeAt14,” read the caption that Catherine Lawson posted above a photo of her teenage self on Twitter last week.
The Nov. 9 social media post by Lawson, a third-year litigation associate at
Within a day of tweeting out her photo, Lawson's #MeAt14 was trending on social media with people sharing photos of themselves along with descriptions of their young lives and underscoring their inability to understand, let alone consent, to a relationship with an adult. Some people also opened up and shared their stories of abuse at 14.
Lawson, now 30 and a registered Republican living in Raleigh, North Carolina, spoke with The American Lawyer about why she started the #MeAt14 social media push and what still needs to be done to keep the conversation about sexual abuse and harassment moving forward.
“This is not a political issue,” Lawson said. “This is just a common value issue.”
Where did this idea come from and why did you decide to put it out there on social media?
Last week, The
For me, that's just not true. I thought that sharing a picture of myself from when I was 14 would kind of illustrate that there's no acceptable version of this story. Kids can't consent to relationships with grown adults under any circumstance. So I thought up the hashtag and went from there.
Obviously, the hashtag took off like a firestorm after that with people sharing photos and descriptions of themselves at 14. What did you think of the overall reaction to it?
I just think that there's a larger conversation that's happening right now around abuse and exploitation, whether it's in the technology industry, Hollywood or politics. This is something that we're learning happens a lot—and a lot more often than people realize. People are beginning to feel comfortable coming forward with their stories and their own experiences of abuse and exploitation.
What's been so extraordinary to watch has been people not only posting pictures of themselves, but to also tell their stories. Stories of childhoods that were innocent and protected, but also to just share their stories of abuse. That's just shown incredible vulnerability from a lot of different people.
What's been the reaction from your co-workers or colleagues in the Big Law world?
They've been completely supportive. I'm really lucky to work with people who understand that there's a distinction between what I do personally and what I do at work. This is something I did personally and they've just been completely supportive.
What do you plan on doing with this new platform? Do you have political aspirations or want to start a nonprofit or some other kind of advocacy group?
At the moment I'm content with where I am. I think honestly this is a conversation that has to be had by a lot more people than just me. Whatever platform I might've had was amplified so much by other women like [“The Daily Show” co-creator] Lizz Winstead, Alyssa Milano and Katie Couric and all the other just normal people who shared their own stories. I hope that the conversation keeps happening. What role I do or don't have in that [discussion] honestly isn't that important to me right now.
Obviously, there's been a lot of conversation on a national scale right now about instances of harassment, and Big Law hasn't necessarily been immune from that. There have been stories about gender-based discrimination and harassment. Have you experienced any kind of objectification or bias, or have you heard from other women in Big Law who have?
I think we'd be kidding ourselves if women didn't have those stories to tell. I think that anytime you have power that's concentrated in a nontransparent, nonaccountable fashion you're going to have abuse. I consider myself incredibly lucky that has not been my experience. I have worked with men and women who have looked out for me, who have mentored me and supported me. I'm grateful for that. I also think that it's a really sad thing that that's something I'm thankful for. That should be the norm for everyone, and not just for a minority of people.
All interviews are condensed and edited for style, grammar and clarity.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250