Hit the Phones! Collection Season Looms Extra Large for New York Law Firms
Rate increases and longer collection cycles mean New York firms have bigger client bills to collect this year-end, according to data from two banks.
November 27, 2017 at 03:46 PM
5 minute read
Collecting year-end payments from clients in the fourth quarter is a business imperative for law firms every year. But for large New York law offices, it may be especially critical—and rewarding—in 2017.
According to two banks' legal industry data about the first nine months of the year, New York-based law firms, still facing mediocre demand at best, have been sitting on large stacks of unbilled and billed time, much more than in previous years and higher than the national average. Citi and Wells Fargo legal industry surveys show high inventories for New York firms from January through September, in large part due to higher than average billing rate increases this year.
“It's more important than usual to convert that inventory to cash,” said Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services at Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group.
Citi figures are based on a sample of 36 New York-headquartered firms, ranging from small to large. The Wells Fargo data is based on a sample of nearly 20 New York firms, including about a dozen of some of the most profitable firms in the country, with profits per partner at $2 million or more and revenue per lawyer at $1 million or more, according to Jeff Grossman, managing director of banking in the bank's Legal Specialty Group.
According to the Citi data on the first nine months of 2017, New York firms' inventory, meaning their accounts receivable and their unbilled time, was up 5.4 percent compared with the same period last year, while the industry inventory overall was up 4.6 percent, Rusanow said. “There's an even greater opportunity for New York firms to push for collection at year-end,” she said.
Wells Fargo's survey shows an even higher rate of inventory for New York firms, up 8.5 percent compared with the first nine months of last year, Grossman said. “That inventory growth exceeds any national benchmark or any regional benchmark,” he said.
Rates on the Rise
The growth isn't necessarily a sign of a flourishing market in the city. Rate increases and a slower collection cycle are factors. The collection cycle lengthened 3.4 percent for New York firms, compared with 0.9 percent for the industry, Rusanow said.
The banks' surveys show billing rate increases at New York firms so far this year are higher than the average across the country.
According to Wells Fargo, billing rates were up 4.5 percent for New York firms, while Citi data showed billing rates for New York firms increased 4.7 percent.
For the industry as a whole, rates were up 4 percent in the first nine months of 2017, said Citi's Rusanow. “Rate increases have been a key driver of revenue growth for several years, and they are stronger than usual,” she said.
For instance, at the most profitable firms in the country, said Grossman, the average partner rate is $1,140 per hour, up from $1,085 last year. The average lawyer rate at these firms also increased last year, to $815 an hour from $775, he said. Both those rates increases are above 5 percent.
“In 2016 and 2017, the very profitable group, many of which are New York firms, are seeing the highest rate increases since the recession,” Grossman said.
Going forward, firms in the Am Law 50, 100 and 200 are all, on average, budgeting a 5 percent increase for 2018, according to Grossman. “That will be three years in a row for pretty robust increases for the largest firms,” he said.
Revenue, Demand Slowdown
According to Citi data about the first nine months of 2017, revenue growth for New York firms was up 2 percent, compared with the industry average of 3.6 percent. New York firms had one of the lowest revenue growth figures compared with other regions in the country, Rusanow said.
Wells Fargo's data showed revenue at New York firms was up 6 percent on average, but that sample included a wide range, Grossman said. One firm was up 19 percent, while another was down 9 percent, he said.
Demand growth also didn't look rosy.
According to Citi, demand at New York firms, based on the number of billable hours logged from January through September, was down 1.9 percent compared with the first nine months of 2016, more severe than the rest of the industry, which was down only 0.2 percent. Rusanow said she heard anecdotally from firms that demand levels were down, specifically in transactional work, in the third quarter.
Wells Fargo reported a slight increase in demand for New York firms, with demand up 1.2 percent.
Overall, 2017 is still shaping up to be a positive year for New York firms—at least on average, and if they can collect what they're owed.
“I see 2017 for the New York firms being a relatively good year because their revenues are up nicely for nine months and they're sitting on a nice amount of inventory,” Wells Fargo's Grossman said. But, he added: “For the industry as a whole, it's very challenged.”
With New York firms' expense growth at 2.7 percent—higher than the rate of revenue growth—collecting on inventory will be important for New York firms to close the gap, said Rusanow from Citi. “It really does come down to the last few months,” she said. “So much will rest on what happens with [year-end] collections.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Utterly Bewildering': GCs Struggle to Grasp Scattershot Nature of Law Firm Rate Hikes
Am Law 50's Runaway Rates Put Onus on Legal Departments to Stiffen Resistance
4 minute readSenior Partners Approach $3,000 an Hour, As More Billing Rate Hikes Expected in 2025
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250