Wall Street Wakes Up to Legal AI for Due Diligence
Kira Systems Inc., a maker of machine learning software to make due diligence more efficient, announced this week that it had signed up two top Am Law 100 firms to use its services.
November 30, 2017 at 05:07 PM
3 minute read
Artificial intelligence is taking up residence in the gilded halls of Wall Street dealmaking.
Kira Systems Inc., a maker of machine learning software designed to make due diligence more efficient, announced this week that it had signed up two of the world's best-known law firms for M&A work: Davis Polk & Wardwell and Latham & Watkins. Kira's CEO, former Weil, Gotshal & Manges associate Noah Waisberg, said other similarly well-known M&A firms are also using his company's technology but have not yet agreed to discuss it publicly.
Other major deal-making firms that have said publicly they use Kira's technology include Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz; Clifford Chance; DLA Piper; and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer. The Toronto-based company has publicly announced deals with 14 clients since March 2016. Those are mostly law firms but also include accounting giant Deloitte, which Waisberg said has 5,000 internal users of Kira software.
“What a year or a year-and-a-half ago was kind of a risky decision for DLA Piper has become something that is much more market standard today,” Waisberg told The American Lawyer. “In contract review, this is the way it is now.”
Kira, which started in 2011 and has not yet raised outside capital, didn't take in any meaningful revenue until the summer of 2014, Waisberg said. The company employed four people by the end of that year. Waisberg said it now has nearly 70 employees.
Artificial intelligence tools have gained momentum but are still a rarity inside law firms, with legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc. reporting in July that only 7.5 percent of firms say they use such tools. That number though is much larger for firms with more than 1,000 lawyers, about 55 percent of which say they are beginning to use AI tools, according to Altman Weil.
“Our firm employs technologies delivered by market leaders such as Kira Systems to help us meet client demands for cutting-edge legal analysis and advice in the most efficient manner possible, while also maintaining a consistently high standard of client service and collaboration,” said Latham's chief information officer Kenneth Heaps.
Magic Circle firm Slaughter & May has invested in Luminance Technologies Ltd., a competitor to Kira that announced this week it had raised $10 million in a funding deal that values the London-based company at $50 million. Luminance has announced partnerships with 17 law firms and other clients. None of those publicly announced firms are in the United States, but Luminance has set up a new office in Chicago with the aim of expanding its business stateside.
Kira's Waisberg said his company had earlier found European law firms to be more receptive to AI. But that has changed in recent months as many large U.S. firms, some of which have developed their own technologies, are increasingly signing up for his company's product.
“Talking about AI in law overall, I think there is both a lot less and a lot more going on than people realize,” Waisberg said. “On the one hand, you hear constant talk of AI in law. On the other hand, there aren't that many companies that are actually selling stuff for sustainable amounts. But there are some. I think in our specific area [of M&A due diligence], I think it's kind of mainstream now.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250