Boutiques Aim to 'Blow the Lid Off' With Associate Bonuses
Los Angeles boutique Hueston Hennigan is among the boutiques across the country treating Cravath's bulging year-end bonuses as a floor, not a ceiling.
December 11, 2017 at 05:42 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
With law firm bonus season in full swing, Susman Godfrey sent a powerful signal to current and future hires on Monday. The Houston-based firm announced that year-end bonuses for its 47 partnership-track associates would range from $45,000 to $170,000—and that two of its associates would receive bonuses totaling more than $220,000.
Beyond the six-figure thank you, the firm's management said the bonuses also serve as a message to top law students who may eventually decide between a future at Susman and a career at a bigger, full-service firm.
“We will match them on the salaries, but we will blow them out of the water when it comes to bonus time,” said Erica Harris, Susman Godfrey's recruiting partner.
“We definitely each year try to send the message that we want the best and you are going to be rewarded if you are the best,” Harris added.
Nationwide, other boutique law firms have also announced associate bonuses equaling or exceeding those offered at Cravath, Swaine & Moore, which traditionally sets the market scale for Big Law bonuses at top firms.
Last month Cravath announced that “virtually all” of its associates will receive a full year-end bonus. The firm's first-years can expect to take home a $15,000 bonus, with payouts ranging up to $100,000 for eighth-year associates. That amounts to total compensation of roughly $195,000 to $415,000 for the firm's young lawyers.
As other Am Law 100 firms have largely matched Cravath's bonus scale, some boutiques have offered even higher rewards.
John Hueston, a founding partner at Los Angeles boutique Hueston Hennigan, confirmed his firm is handing associates, who already earn salaries comparable to their Cravath peers, year-end bonuses equaling 30 to 50 percent of their salaries. (Those bonuses were first reported by Above the Law.)
The firm calculates bonuses partly on associates' length of service and performance, Hueston said. The firm, which has a 1:3 partner-to-associate ratio and 48 lawyers, also chips in 3 percent of associates' gross pay to their 401(k) retirement accounts.
“We want to reward their hard work. Our mission is to create an entrepreneurial spirit in the firm,” Hueston said. He noted Hueston Hennigan has issued such generous bonuses at the end of each of the three years since it began.
The firm's largesse gets plenty of trade-press attention and helps with recruiting, Hueston said. “We don't publish [the bonuses], but they get in the press. It's a tradition,” he said.
Beth Wilkinson, a former Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner who co-founded Washington, D.C.'s Wilkinson Walsh + Eskovitz in February 2016, said her firm bases bonuses entirely on associates' length of service. Wilkinson Walsh gave its first-year associates $22,500 bonuses and its most senior associates $150,000 bonuses.
“We are delighted to recognize the extraordinary talents and efforts of our associates, who drive our success,” Wilkinson said in a statement.
At least two other boutiques reported that they would match Cravath's bonuses: Kaplan & Company, a boutique started by another former Paul Weiss woman partner, Roberta Kaplan, and Holwell Shuster & Goldberg, a firm founded by former U.S. District Judge Richard Holwell of the Southern District of New York and other White & Case alums.
'Playing With the Big Boys'
Law firm consultants said boutiques that have the money for lavish bonuses see plenty of potential upside.
For starters, the bonuses cost the boutiques relatively little, particularly when compared to their profits. As a rule, boutiques have fewer associates per partner than traditional Big Law firms, so their equity partners' net income usually dwarfs the total cost of the bonuses, the consultants said.
“These firms have got the money. If they choose to invest it this way, it's no sweat for them,” said Kent Zimmermann, a legal consultant at the Zeughauser Group.
But what's relatively little cash for the boutiques' partners can represent game-changing sums for individual, often debt-burdened associates. “These bonuses are meaningful. When you're fresh out of law school, still paying big student loans, a 30 percent bonus is usually a big deal,” Zimmermann said.
The well-publicized bonuses also help the law firms when they recruit, as Susman Godfrey's Harris noted.
“It helps establish their credibility as being as top-drawer as any of the white-shoe firms,” said Janet Stanton of Adam Smith Esq. in New York.
The bonuses are not handed out defensively, she said. Associates are not demanding them. Instead, the firms are making a deliberate marketing decision and showing “they are playing with the Big Boys,” Stanton said.
Susman Godfrey's associate compensation news has drawn attention in the past. The firm jolted the market in 2016 when it hiked starting associate salaries to $190,000, and then this summer crammed another lure on its hiring hook: a $25,000 signing bonus.
Last week, Neal Manne, a co-managing partner at Susman Godfrey, predicted in an email that his firm's associate 2017 bonuses would “blow the lid off” the competition.
Did the forecast come true? So far Susman is the firm to beat. But with nearly three weeks still left in the year, its competitors still have a say in the matter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMorrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Elite Boutiques Competing More With Big Law Bonuses, With Several Going Above Market
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Georgia Justices Urged to Revive Malpractice Suit Against Retired Barnes & Thornburg Atty
- 2How Gibson Dunn Lawyers Helped Assemble the LA FireAid Benefit Concert in 'Extreme' Time Crunch
- 3Lawyer Wears Funny Ears When Criticizing: Still Sued for Defamation
- 4Medical Student's Error Takes Center Stage in High Court 'Agency' Dispute
- 5'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250