In 2018, Law Firms Will Face Greater Challenges Than Slow Growth
A new report by Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group finds that a slow-growth market for legal services will not abate in 2018. That's just one of several issues facing managing partners as their partnerships continue to age and more competitors squeeze onto their turf.
December 14, 2017 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
The slow-growth market for legal services will not abate in 2018, states a report from Citi Private Bank's Law Firm Group set to be released Thursday, although that will not be the only challenge facing managing partners as their partnerships continue to age and more competitors squeeze onto their turf.
In many ways, the report, co-authored by Hildebrandt Consulting, expects the market for law firms in 2018 to be similar to this year, which through three quarters Citi claims has resulted in revenue growth of 3.6 percent; expenses growth of 3.8 percent; and demand stalling by 0.2 percent. The report expects mid-single digit growth in revenue and profits per equity partner in 2018.
Volatility will continue across the market in 2018, according to the report. Firms that saw revenue growth in 2017 are far from guaranteed the same result next year, as one firm's growth is increasingly seen as coming at the expense of other firms.
“The most pressing point about 2018 is the market will continue to grow modestly, and in a market where there is such wide dispersion, the question is how will you be the firm who is on the 50 percent of the equation who is growing?” said Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services in Citi's Law Firm Group. “How are you going to be able to win that work from other firms?”
➤➤ Check out The Law Firm Disrupted, a new weekly briefing by Roy Strom that surveys the competitive pressures on modern law firms. A benefit of your American Lawyer or Law.com All-Access subscription. Sign up here.
Increased lateral hiring activity and continued consolidation through mergers or large group hires are some ways firms will look to grow. The Citi report stated that activity is primarily driven by volatility in the industry. With more than 75 law firm mergers announced through three quarters this year, a recent analysis by legal consultancy Altman Weil Inc.'s MergerLine put the legal industry on pace for another record year of combinations. (And more could be in the offing, according to sibling publication the New York Law Journal.)
Still, those tactics are not without risks. The Citi study noted that firm leaders reported 59 percent of lateral hires made from 2011 to 2016 were deemed a financial success. Mergers, too, can bring trouble, especially if they are viewed primarily as a way to capture market share.
“These combinations will never perform as well as tactical, synergistic moves to strengthen market positions or enter new markets,” stated the report. “We also do not subscribe to the notion that a combination can remedy underlying systemic challenges that both participant firms are facing independently, as some combinations have sought to do.”
Apart from the immediate market conditions, 2018 will bring into sharper relief longer-term challenges facing managing partners. High on that list is the changing leverage model for large law firms.
After years of closely controlling the ranks of equity partners, Citi found that 32 percent of equity partners are now at or approaching retirement age. The report expects “an onslaught” of partner retirements in the coming years, a subject covered in detail by The American Lawyer last year. Firms may not be well-positioned to deal with them, according to the report, due to a lack of talent management in their younger partner ranks or senior associate tier.
“Part of that is because so much of the growth in the past three to four years has been through lateral partners,” said Brad Hildebrandt of Hildebrandt Consulting. “So there were very little associates [that] made equity partners. And I think what you've had is a kind of bulk-up in the middle, but not all those people performing all that well. The long-term issue is where is the new talent coming from? That's the issue.”
The report by Hildebrandt and Citi claims “the vast majority” of law firm partners have told them that they expect to increase the number of associates at their firms. Meanwhile, there is pressure on income partners, with only one-third of firms planning to increase that group of lawyers.
On top of those demographic concerns, firms will increasingly face competition from alternative legal providers next year and beyond, according to the report. The Big Four accounting firms figure to be major players, as the report noted that the group is well-suited to respond to client demands for efficient delivery of legal services. The Big Four's annual spending on technology and training in a year eclipses the revenue of any given law firm, according to the report.
While most of the current competition from the Big Four comes in legal markets outside the United States, Citi's Rusanow said it would be a mistake to think that doesn't mean they can compete in providing a wide swathe of legal services. The Big Four can handle cross-border work and Rusanow believes their investments in technology will make them a competitor to efficiently handle tasks that have made up the majority of associates' time for years.
“That all suggests that they will be a market force at some stage,” Rusanow said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDepartures, Layoffs and Breakups at the Likes of Kirkland, Skadden and Mayer Brown: Asia's Top Stories 2024
As Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250